According to a study published on Saturday July 2 in the scientific medical journal The Lancet, many European cases of monkeypox have different symptoms.
The first British patients of the monkeypoxa disease that has been spreading around the world since the spring, would present symptoms different from those usually spotted in African countries where this condition was previously limited, according to a study published on Saturday.
Fever but not systematically
While a fever attack was considered almost systematic in monkeypox, just over half of patients studied in the United Kingdom had it, notes this study published in the Lancet Infectious Diseases.
Carried out with about fifty patients, this work, still limited, is one of the first to characterize the clinical specificities of the current epidemic of “monkeypox”.
This disease was previously limited to ten African countries. But, for several months many cases, more than 3,000 at the latest news from theWorld Health Organization (WHO), have been registered in Europe and the Americas.
The IHR Emergency Committee unanimously acknowledged the emergency nature of the event & that controlling the further spread of #monkeypox outbreak requires intense response efforts.https://t.co/IeSzbrtKcz
— World Health Organization (WHO) (@WHO) June 25, 2022
The United Kingdom is one of the first countries where cases have been reported this year, hence the interest of this work based on observations made at the end of May, when only a hundred British patients had been recorded.
The sample therefore corresponds to more than half of the known patients in the country at the time. And, among them, the monkeypox manifested itself distinctly differently from what was known in Africa. Not only are bouts of fever less frequent, but they also appear much shorter and require far fewer hospitalizations.
As for the typical lesions of the disease, they are most often concentrated around the genitals. In the previous cases, they were generally larger, reaching for example the face or the nape of the neck.
A SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASE?
For the authors of the study, this specificity suggests that the first British cases were contaminated by contact during sexual relations. This hypothesis, to be clearly distinguished from the idea that the disease has become sexually transmitted, corresponds to the well-established notion that contamination is possible by touching a skin lesion in another patient.
The majority of European cases and Americans have so far been recorded in men who have had homosexual relations, but they are not the only ones concerned.
More broadly, the authors of the study consider that their observations plead to broaden the definition of the disease in order to better detect new cases, without insisting so much on a fever.
However, these different symptoms do not mean that the current epidemic is due to a new version of the virus, as other researchers point out.